AustinS Aff. Side On Sanctions Essays - International Sanctions

Austin'S Aff. Side On Sanctions AUSTINS AFF. SIDE ON SANCTIONS Silence, who is a man who stands silent? Who is a man who doesnt stand up for what is right? That man is condoning the present activity. He is allowing the status quo to proceed. So what is the alternative? WAR, mass destruction, children lie dead in streets, mothers are killed, babies are left fir dead, home are burned, generations are wiped out. Millions are dead. Countries require decades to reconstruct, heal emotions and whatever good might arise out of all of these only follows years latter after emotions and hostilities are lifted. However being silent is just as deadly as going to war. But there is infect the middle ground to both of these. This middle ground to both of these terrible issues. A middle ground that doesnt require the lives, the money, and the sacrifices that a war might impose on this country or the rest of the world. This middle ground is ECONMIC SANCTIONS. This is why I affirm the resolution The value I hold for todays debate is very clear SAFTEY. At this tim e I do not feel it is nessary to define any terms at this moment, however if does become nessary I will do so at apporite time. I will defend the aff side with the following conts. SANCTIONS ARE THE BRIDIGE THAT ALLOWS NATIONS TO CROSS OVER WAR WITH OUT GOING. 2 WITH OUT SANCTIONS THE WORLD WOULD BE A WAR ZONE. 3 SANCTIONS ARE EFFECTIVE 1. Going into my first cont. I would like to set the goal of economies sanctions: from the journal of commerce in 1998 THE GOAL OF IS STRAIGHT FOWDARD TO HALT ROGUE BEHAVIOR BY HITTING THE TARGET COUNTRY WHERE IT HURTS THE MOST IN THE POCKETBOOK. Now lets go back to the days of the colonist in early America they embossed embargos on England after receiving the TOWNSEND ACTS and they worked, England was only able to comply with the Americans because they were holding their pocket book in their hand so they were helpless. Following this Madison AND Jefferson debated over forgein policy. Jefferson and Madison happened to come to almost the same conc. about forgien policy about sanctions MADISION 1embargo 2 war 3 submission and tribute. However Jefferson had a different idea. 1 diplomacy sanction and war. In Jeffersons words how can America deal with terrorists, proliferarors, and genocidal dictators? Our options would be empty talk and send in the marines. What Jefferson is trying to say is America needs away to be able to threaten terrorists, dictators etc. before they try to harm human life, the US needs away to to tell the worlds most deadly people that if they try things such as genoside or other wrong doings America will intervine to protect the welfare of life. Ex. nazi, Germany, Iraq, Kosho. All of these are prime examples that the US will intervene if such affiances occur. 2 WITHOUT SANCTIONS THE WORLD WOULD BE CONSTANTLY AT WAR. Now lets consider a world with out sanctions a world in which goes from diplomacy to war skipping the sanctions. How could America prevent dictators such a Saddam in Iraq from making VX gas and other biological and chemical weapons of warfare? Could we stop a man in Kosovo form killing many innocent people because they werent the right color or religion? The answer in no we would be in constant war or we would just sit by and allow the present activity to proceed as human life was taken innocently. And lets think, If we didnt intervene in Iraq where would the weapons be pointing this very day. Our allies Israel, Kuat, or in the worst scenario the United States of America. I dont know about you but that just doesnt settle good with dinner to think one day I could be out in the yard fit playing Frisbee and the next watching my naborhors house be blown up followed by mine form a ballistic missile driven by a man that hates everything to do with America. So I cant figure out how anyone t hinks that this could be immoral? 3 SANCTIONS ARE EFFECTIVE From the forgein affairs committee in Washington DC.

The Packinghouse Daughter essays

The Packinghouse Daughter essays This novel tells the story of a small-town, working-class life in the mid 1900s. The daughter of a meatpacking company millwright, Cheri Register tells about the event, which divides her small town of Albert Lea during time of depression. Albert Lea, Minnesota was an industrial town of only 13,545 people. Surrounding the area was cornfields, lakes, cattail marshes, knolls, and oak groves. Albert Lea still was in the 1950s when this story began. Cheri was an elementary student. Her school plans many field trips, which tend to be excursions in industrial technology. Cheri and her classmates visit places, which serve an entertainment and educational purpose. They have visited placed such as printing press, Coca-Cola, and egg hatching victories. Their next trip was different. Cheri and her class were to visit the Wilson s father had worked since 1943. Not speaking much of his job Cheri didnt know much about her fathers work. This trip consisted of a parents signature because of the scene it may bring to the youngsters. Each kid had the option not to participate in the activity that morning since once they entered there was no turning back. They describe the trip as very scenic and educational. For the rest of the day the kids talked to each other about the incredible views, which they encountered. Such as the hundreds of people who worked there and how the as sembly lines for the animals just never ended, one after another after another. Wilson s dad at this time was in a verbatim pattern of a workday, dinner, and falling aslee...