Software Systems Fundamental Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Programming Systems Fundamental - Essay Example This report will talk about some product advancement issues which can cause by and large programming improvement disappointment. Reason for SOFTWARE FAILURE According to May (2000), the lion's share programming ventures flop halfway or absolutely because of programming unfit to meet every single set up necessity, cost and time invade or less successful task the board. These prerequisites could incorporate calendar, cost, destinations or quality related (May, 2000). This segment traces the causes and factors of programming advancement disappointment: Poor User Requirements The procedure of programming improvement disappointment begins when a client expresses the framework advancement necessities in a less compelling manner. Along these lines the framework created based on such broken framework necessities become a debacle. In this situation, the failure to express the client prerequisites can be because of absence of programming working information, poor comprehension of programming w orking or less compelling business process data. Be that as it may, mismarks in prerequisites recording should be possible on the two sides at customer side or at engineer side (May, 2000) and (Kaur and Sengupta, 2011). ... Additionally, the absence of successful task quality administration plan can cause less powerful venture quality that lead to extend disappointment (May, 2000) and (Kaur and Sengupta, 2011). Disappointment of Cost and Schedule Estimation Another significant explanation of programming improvement disappointment is the less viable expense and time estimation. What's more, viable expense and time estimations are significant for the fruitful programming advancement. In any case, it relies upon the task administrator and group pioneer to gauge and make sense of significant undertaking components to all the more likely evaluate the venture time and cost perspectives. Additionally, if the time and cost of programming improvement venture invades, it will irritable lead to by and large disappointment of task (May, 2000) and (Kaur and Sengupta, 2011). Group Size Estimation of group size is essential in programming advancement venture. On a very basic level there are 3 primary sorts of group li ttle, medium and huge. In any case, group choice is totally founded on the undertaking size on the off chance that the task size is little, at that point chiefs clearly take the little group and if there should arise an occurrence of enormous venture they can choose the huge or medium group. In addition, the choice of group size relies upon venture pioneers or chiefs how effectively they can see the extend and build up an even task group. Moreover, a great deal of programming improvement ventures flop because of less compelling group size that can prompt some of broad issues with respect to powerful extend the board. This can likewise prompt enhancing the task cost and harming venture execution (Kaur and Sengupta, 2011). Human Resource Skills Effective and efficient group for a product improvement is extremely basic. Seeing that in programming improvement a viable group for

European Security and Defence Policy: An Analysis

European Security and Defense Policy: An Analysis Presentation Confronted with the difficulties and dangers emerging during the time spent financial globalization and world request, Europe is attempting to react satisfactorily to it, to be specific, making a general political solidarity, and shaping an European character. Inside the EU there is ramified instrument of monetary, political and lawful organs and organizations, did the cooperation of the part conditions of joining affiliations for all intents and purposes every which way. The political development of the EU has increased another incredible force after its incorporation of legitimate and institutional system in the establishing record of the EU in the Maastricht Treaty, the supposed second mainstay of the European Union, entitled Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP). At the current phase of EU improvement the issue about adequacy of the CFSP and ESDP specifically is remaining intense, that is the subject of the viability of the general methodology and aggregate activity in tending to international strategy issues. This inquiry is critical considering occasions identifying with the settlement of a contention in the Balkans after the breakdown of the Yugoslav state at the outset and end of the 90s., with the battle against psychological oppression after September 11, 2001 in New York and Washington, Madrid in 2004, and London in 2005 and the recreation of Afghanistan just as the circumstance around Iraq. Ongoing Russias attack of Georgia on Aug. 7 o f 2008 indicated that the danger of conventional military encounter has not vanished. In this manner, Europe must rebuild their military so as to do military tasks in both security settings, figuring out what dangers it will face and how best to counter them. It has been a long time since the development of ESDP. During this time the EU has confronted numerous difficulties related with the usage of this approach, going from absence of assets, institutional shortcoming, finishing with the impact of the world players. Despite the fact that, it is still right on time to reached a positive determinations in regards to the adequacy of ESDP. Be that as it may, we can discuss some fittingness of the procedure that has been built up in this pattern. Hence the point of this individual research paper is an endeavor to break down the fundamental issues looked by the EU towards the powerful execution of ESDP, and what the conceivable outcomes opened up for Europe inside the system of ESDP after the marking of the Treaty of Lisbon. This work is an investigation of the exercises learned so as to incorporate them into future improvement of this establishment or some other associations. As per the reason for this work, it is organized into 3 sections. First part will give a chance to elucidate how inner and outside components have pushed the EU to set up ESDP, just as the pretended by EU 3 (France, Germany and Great Britain) in the production of this approach. Besides, it will investigate worry about disposition of the US towards the creation and improvement of this strategy. Second part examined a presence of ESDP and feature the fundamental difficulties which has been recognized by the expert for as far back as 10 years as respects to common, military and money related assets. I have picked the whole time of ESDP presence, as this approach is still extremely youthful for the absolutely evaluate its definitive viability and plausibility. At the end of the day, this is investigation of exercises learned. Third section will concentrate on the conceivable outcomes of ESDP. It will inspect what changes can be normal sooner rather than later corresponding to this strategy, with respect to the upgrades towards expanding of military and non military personnel limits. Moreover it will underline the primary changes and openings which brings recently affirmed Lisbon Treaty. The work is completed by factious paper strategy. This investigation paper won't break down totally directed and continuous missions of ESDP, likewise it won't address history of ESDP advancement, as this paper will concentrate just on issues that meddle with this strategy to exist autonomously and adequacy, and the shrouded potential outcomes of this approach are not yet completely valued. Likewise, the inquiry concerning connection between the Greece, Turkey and Cyprus that acquires a few challenges participation among NATO and ESDP are absent in this article. Political setting as a hindrance for the improvement of powerful ESDP on the contemporary stage Preconditions for the making of ESDP So as to comprehend the marrow of ESDP it bodes well to consider the inward and outer preconditions that prompted the making of this approach. Among the outside preconditions are commanded before the finish of the Cold War and the occasions of 9/11 in the U.S. At one time the encounter with Warsaw Pact had obstructing the formation of a really European arrangement of security, moving the equalization of impact for NATO and the United States. Be that as it may, in late 1980 the circumstance started to change quickly. The premise and reason for the transoceanic relationship had changed. Change of the geostrategic circumstance in the mainland, related with the breakdown of the Soviet Union, and, as needs be, the bipolar arrangement of global relations has opened up to Western European nations, chances to turn out to be progressively appealing focus of intensity in the circle of security. Thus, expanding monetary job of the EU offered ascend to the craving of European pioneers to supplement its general political and military instruments, without which the impact of the EU in worldwide issues would stay negligible. All through the 1990s the EU was searching for such devices. Nonetheless, early outcomes have been fair a typical international strategy and security approach has not gotten an extremely normal and was inadequate to stay away from a disaster in the Balkans.[1] Therefore, the developing conviction that all is good vacuum in Europe made nearer places of the Member States (EU MS), which prompted the appearance of ESDP. Ordinary military powers, which are utilized to work in Europe, didn't address the difficulties and dangers natural in post-bipolar world, it was the need to develop powers with adaptable structure fit for performing non-customary military capacities. To keep up the security structure at the current level were required costly frameworks. What's more, the goals of emergency circumstances required the nearness of exceptionally versatile units, outfitted with the most recent weapons and correspondence frameworks. The military financial plans of the most country states have been not able to meet the necessities of the military division advancements. Subsequently, Europe has left two alternatives: to keep on depending on the United States or endeavor to coordinate into the military circle and make own powers. Sooner or later another improvement for the advancement of a free ESDP had showed up, for example, conflict with U.S. unilateralism and U.S. control of NATO. The distinctions in the places of the U.S. what's more, Europe developed during the contentions in the Balkans and, most unmistakably during the Iraqi emergency. European sharpness has been incited by the real change of NATO in the conductor of the American worldwide technique. Along these lines, the European states felt that they can not depend completely on the U.S. as an underwriter of security in the district, and questioned that Washingtons arrangement towards Europe would be steady with their inclinations and needs. Thus, it turned out to be certain that if the EU looks to impact worldwide arrangement motivation, as opposed to follow in the wake of the United States, it will at last require the status and capacity to utilize brutal intends to guarantee security. Accordingly, the production of ESDP was the most suitable com ponent through which earnest issues would be tackled. The EU 3 (Britain, France and Germany) and their job being developed of ESDP The genuine forward leap in the European participation in security circle were the understandings reached at the Franco-British culmination in Saint-Malo (December 1998). In the highest point presentation had been referenced about the need to give chances to EU independent military tasks, with the goal that the EU would have the option to make choices and lead military move in situations where the [Atlantic] Alliance isn't included [in the goals of the crisis].[2] The exchanges, started by the British side, were not constrained by the affirmations and the European Council in 1999 and 2000s had been taken various choices so as to reinforce the CFSP and make ESDP. At the Cologne culmination institutional structure of ESDP has been fixed, and subsequently at the Helsinki highest point expressed the principle objective, later changed into inventory of powers. This objective was about creation continuously of 2003 such abilities that would permit operational sending of powers with the qua lities of 50-60 a large number of troops (snappy response power) that could support themselves at any rate one year, the last guidelines were at long last found in the Treaty of Nice, marked in February 2001. Up till now, there is a contradiction among the EU 3, about how the EU can turn into a progressively compelling and powerful entertainer on the planet and what relations it must form with the US. These distinctions are related with various ways to deal with the European incorporation when all is said in done. It will be thought of, the job have been playing by Britain, France and Germany in ESDP, and what the significant contrasts of their dreams towards the execution and quintessence of this arrangement. The main point which is vital to bring up is the issue What ESDP is for? furthermore, we could discover unmistakably various methodologies from the Three, where the British trust in a transoceanic Europe, the French uphold the idea of Europe as a force, while the Germans are profoundly dedicated to the possibility of Europe as a specialist for peace.[3] Further it will uncover these methodologies all the more profoundly. For quite a while, Britain stayed a resolute partner of the US, and didn't felt the need to

The Color Psychology of Blue

The Color Psychology of Blue Theories Cognitive Psychology Print The Color Psychology of Blue By Kendra Cherry facebook twitter Kendra Cherry, MS, is an author, educational consultant, and speaker focused on helping students learn about psychology. Learn about our editorial policy Kendra Cherry Reviewed by Reviewed by Amy Morin, LCSW on February 22, 2020 facebook twitter instagram Amy Morin, LCSW, is a psychotherapist, author of the bestselling book 13 Things Mentally Strong People Dont Do, and a highly sought-after speaker. Learn about our Wellness Board Amy Morin, LCSW on February 22, 2020 More in Theories Cognitive Psychology Behavioral Psychology Developmental Psychology Personality Psychology Social Psychology Biological Psychology Psychosocial Psychology How does the color blue make you feel? People have long believed that certain colors can evoke different moods and feelings, and some research has supported the idea that colors can have psychological effects.?? Blue is a color often found in nature such as the pale blue of a daytime sky or the rich dark blue of a deep pool of water. It is for this reason perhaps that people often describe the color blue as calm and serene. Yet as a cool color, blue can sometimes seem icy, distant, or even cold. Learn more about some of the feelings and moods created by the color blue. Illustration by Cindy Chung, Verywell The Psychology of the Color Blue According to color psychology: Blue is described as a favorite color by many people and is the color most preferred by men.Because blue is favored by so many people, it is often viewed as a non-threatening color that can seem conservative and traditional.Blue calls to mind feelings of calmness or serenity. It is often described as peaceful, tranquil, secure, and orderly.Blue is often seen as a sign of stability and reliability. Businesses that want to project an image of security often utilize blue in their advertising and marketing efforts.Blue can also create feelings of sadness or aloofness. Consider how a painting that heavily features blue, such as those produced by Picasso during his blue period, can seem so lonely, sad, or forlorn.Blue is often used to decorate offices because research has shown that people are more productive in blue rooms.Blue is one of the most popular colors, but it is one of the least appetizing. Some weight loss plans even recommend eating your food off of a blue plate. Blue rarely oc curs naturally in food aside from blueberries and some plums. Also, humans are geared to avoid foods that are poisonous and blue coloring in food is often a sign of spoilage or poison.Blue can also lower the pulse rate and body temperature.Consider how blue is used in language: blue moon, blue Monday, blue blood, the blues, and blue ribbon. How Does Blue Make You Feel? Look at the use of blue in the image that accompanies this article. How does blue make you feel? Do you associate blue with certain qualities or situations? One important thing to remember is that the feelings evoked by certain colors are not necessarily universal. Cultural differences sometimes play a role in how people perceive color. Individual experiences also have an important effect on the moods that colors can create. If you associate the color blue with a vivacious and lively friend, then you might see it as a high energy color that evokes a sense of excitement. Reader Responses to the Color Blue While blue has different symbolic meanings, individual reactions to the color blue can vary widely. The following are some of the reactions to the color blue that readers have shared over the years. Blue Is Sincere Blue is the colour of sky, ocean, sleep, and twilight. It is a color that makes me feel so good. When I see it, I almost feel like I am in heaven. For me, blue is the colour of sincerity, inspiration, and spirituality. It makes me feel like I am good enough. â€"  pradnya Blue Is Calming I love the sight of blue...especially shades of turquoise like teal and aquamarine. I tend to be naturally drawn to this color; I believe because it is the color of my aura. I am already a very calm, serene, emotionally balanced person but when Im around the color blue, I am less nervous and more comfortable and communicative in the presence of others. â€"  Latia Blue Can Also Be Intense Many people think of blue as being peaceful and serene, like a clear summer sky or calming waters. However, when blues are deep and intense this internal reflection changes. Skies become stormy and waters will rage. Blue now arouses a feeling of emotional energy, strength and spirit. â€" sunset707 Blue Brings Both Inspiration and Sadness I love blue, because its the colour of the ocean and the sky. The colour blue makes me feel calm, quiet, reflective and strong. When I look at the blue waters of the ocean, I feel calm and very strong, I feel free like the moving waves and yet there is a sadness to it which at times fill my eyes with tears -I dont understand why. No colour like great blue! â€" Guest Sharon A Word From Verywell While exploring the psychology of color can be interesting, it is also important to remember that reactions to color can also be highly personal. Past experiences can play a role in shaping how people feel about and respond to different colors. While some people find blue to be a sad or somber color, others may interpret it as peaceful or inspiring. Pay attention to how the color blue makes you feel and consider some of the different influences that may have influenced your feelings. The Psychology of Colors

A New List of Anti-Suffragist Reasons

Alice Duer Miller, a writer and poet, wrote a column in the early 20th century for the  New York Tribune  called Are Women People? In this column, she satirized the ideas of the anti-suffrage movement, as a way of promoting womens suffrage. These were published in 1915 in a book by the same name. In this column, she sums up reasons given by the anti-suffrage forces arguing against the womens vote. Millers dry humor comes through as she pairs reasons that contradict each other. Through this simple pairing of mutually contradictory arguments of the anti-suffrage movement, she hopes to show that that their positions are self-defeating. Below these excerpts, youll find additional information about the arguments made. Our Own Twelve Anti-Suffragist Reasons Because no woman will leave her domestic duties to vote.Because no woman who may vote will attend to her domestic duties.Because it will make dissension between husband and wife.Because every woman will vote as her husband tells her to.Because bad women will corrupt politics.Because bad politics will corrupt women.Because women have no power of organization.Because women will form a solid party and outvote men.Because men and women are so different that they must stick to different duties.Because men and women are so much alike that men, with one vote each, can represent their own views and ours too.Because women cannot use force.Because the militants did use force. Reasons #1 and #2 Arguments #1 and #2 are both based on the assumption that a woman has domestic duties, and is based on the separate spheres ideology  that women belong in the domestic sphere, taking care of the home and the children, while men belong in the public sphere. In this ideology, women ruled the domestic sphere and men the public sphere—women had domestic duties and men had public duties. In this division, voting is part of public duties, and thus not a womans proper place. Both arguments assume that women have domestic duties, and both assume that domestic duties and public duties cannot both be attended to by women. In argument #1, its assumed that all women (all being an obvious exaggeration) will chose to stick with their domestic duties, and thus wont vote even if they win the vote. In argument #2, its assumed that if women are permitted to vote, that they will all then abandon completely their domestic duties. Cartoons of the time often emphasized the latter point, showing m en forced into domestic duties. Reasons #3 and #4 In  arguments #3 and #4, the common topic is the effect of a womans vote on marriage, and both assume that husband and wife will discuss their votes. The first of these arguments assumes that if the husband and wife differ on how theyll vote, the fact that she is able to actually cast a vote will make for dissension in the marriage—assuming either that he wont care about her disagreement with his vote if he is the only one to cast a vote, or that she wont mention her disagreement unless shes permitted to vote. In the second, its assumed that all husbands have the power to tell their wives how to vote, and that the wives will obey. A third related argument, not documented in Millers list, was that women already had undue influence on voting because they could influence their husbands and then vote themselves, assuming apparently that women had more influence than men than vice versa. The arguments assume different outcomes when a husband and wife disagree about their vote: th at the dissension will be a problem only if the woman can vote, that the woman will obey her husband, and in the third argument which Miller doesnt include, that the woman is more likely to shape her husbands vote than vice versa. Not all can be true of all couples who disagree, nor is it a given that husbands will know what their wives votes will be. Or, for that matter, that all women who will vote are married. Reasons #5 and #6 In this time period, machine politics and their corrupting influence was a common theme already. A few argued for the educated vote, assuming that many who were uneducated voted merely as the political machine wanted them to. In the words of one speaker in 1909, documented in the  New York Times,  The great majority of the Republicans and Democrats follow their leader to the polls as the children followed the Pied Piper. The domestic sphere ideology that assigns women to the home and men to public life (business, politics) is also assumed here. Part of this ideology assumes that women are more pure than men, less corrupt, in part because they are not in the public realm.  Women who are not properly in their place are bad women, and thus #5 argues that they will corrupt politics (as if its not corrupt already). Argument #6 assumes that women, protected by not having the vote from the corrupting influence of politics, will become corrupted by participating actively. This ignores that if politics is corrupt, the influence on women is already a negative influence. One key argument of the pro-suffrage activists is that in corrupt politics, the pure motives of women entering the political realm will clean it up. This argument may be criticized as similarly exaggerated and based on assumptions about womens proper place. Reasons #7 and #8 Pro-suffrage arguments included that womens vote would be good for the country because it would lead to needed reforms. Because there was no national experience with what would happen if women could vote, two contradictory predictions were possible by those who opposed womens vote. In reason #7, the assumption was that women were not organized politically, ignoring their organization to win the vote, work for temperance laws, work for social reforms. If women werent organized politically, then their votes wouldnt be very different from those of men, and there would be no effect of women voting. In reason #8, the pro-suffrage argument about the influence of women in voting was seen as something to fear, that what was already in place, supported by the men who voted, could be overturned if women voted. So these two arguments were mutually incompatible: either women would have an effect on the outcome of voting, or they would not. Reasons #9 and #10 In #9, the anti-suffrage argument is back to the separate spheres ideology, that mens sphere and womens spheres are justified because men and women are so different, and thus women are necessarily excluded by their nature from the political realm including voting. In #10, an opposite argument is mustered, that wives will vote the same as their husband anyway, to justify that women voting is unnecessary because men can vote what was sometimes called at the time a family vote. Reason #10 is also in tension with arguments #3 and #4 which assume that wife and husband will often have disagreement about how to vote. Part of the separate spheres argument was that women were by nature more peaceful, less aggressive, and thus unsuited to the public sphere. Or, in contrast, the argument was that women were by nature more emotional, potentially more aggressive and violent, and that women were to be relegated to the private sphere so that their emotions would be held in check. Reasons #11 and #12 Reason #11 assumes that voting sometimes is related to the use of force—voting for candidates who might be pro-war or pro-policing, for instance. Or that politics itself is about force. And then assuming that women are by nature unable to be aggressive or support aggression. Argument #12 justifies being against women voting, pointing to the force used by British and later American suffrage movements. The argument calls up images of Emmeline Pankhurst, women smashing windows in London, and plays into the idea that women are to be controlled by keeping them in the private, domestic sphere. Reductio ad absurdum Alice Duer Millers popular columns on the anti-suffrage arguments often played on similar  reductio ad absurdum  logical argument, attempting to show that if one followed all the anti-suffrage arguments, an absurd and untenable result followed, as the arguments contradicted each other. The assumptions behind some arguments, or the conclusions predicted, were impossible to both be true. Were some of these strawman arguments—that is, a refutation of an argument that wasnt really being made, an inaccurate view of the other sides argument? When Miller characterizes the opposing arguments as implying that  all  women or  all  couples would do one thing, she may move into strawman territory. While sometimes exaggerating, and perhaps weakening her argument if she were in a merely logical discussion, her purpose was satire—to highlight through her dry humor the contradictions inherent in the arguments against women getting the vote.

The Definition of Ethnicity in Sociology

In sociology, ethnicity is a concept referring to a shared culture and a way of life. This can be reflected in language, religion, material culture such as clothing and cuisine, and cultural products such as music and art. Ethnicity is often a major source of social cohesion as well as social conflict. The world is home to thousands of ethnic groups, from the Han Chinese—the largest ethnic group in the world—to the smallest indigenous groups, some of which include only a few dozen people. Almost all of these groups possess a shared history, language, religion, and culture, which provide group members with a common identity. Learned Behavior Ethnicity, unlike race, is not based on biological traits, except in the case of ethnic groups that recognize certain traits as requirements for membership. In other words, the cultural elements that define a particular ethnic group are taught, not inherited. This means that the boundaries between ethnic groups are, to some degree, fluid, allowing for individuals to move between groups. This can happen, for example, when a child from one ethnic group is adopted into another, or when an individual undergoes a religious conversion. It can also happen through the process of acculturation, whereby members of a native group are forced to adopt the culture and manners of a dominating host group. Ethnicity should not be confused with nationality, which refers to citizenship. While some countries are largely composed of a single ethnic group (Egypt, Finland, Germany, China), others are composed of many different groups (United States, Australia, Philippines, Panama). The rise of nation-states in Europe in the 1600s led to the creation of many countries that are still ethnically homogenous today. The population of Germany, for example, is 91.5 percent German. Countries that were founded as colonies, on the other hand, are more likely to be home to multiple ethnicities. Examples Different ethnic groups do not use the same criteria to define group membership. While one group may emphasize the importance of a shared language, another may emphasize the importance of a shared religious identity. French Canadians are an ethnic group for whom language is paramount. It is what connects them to the French colonists who first settled Canada in the 1600s and what distinguishes them from English Canadians, Scottish Canadians, and Irish Canadians. Other aspects of culture, such as religion, are less significant when it comes to defining who is and is not French Canadian. Most French Canadians are Christians, but some are Catholic and others are Protestant. In contrast, religion is an essential part of ethnic identity for groups such as the Jews. Unlike French Canadians, Jews do not define themselves based on a single shared language. In fact, Jewish communities throughout the world have developed a variety of different languages, including Hebrew, Yiddish, Ladino (Judeo-Spanish), Judeo-Arabic, and Judeo-Aramaic (not to mention the many Jews who speak English, French, German, or any other of the worlds many languages). Because ethnic groups are self-defined, it is important to remember that no single aspect of group identity (language, religion, etc.) can be used to sort people into one group or another. Flashpop / Getty Images Race vs. Ethnicity Unlike ethnicity, race is based on physical traits that are inherited, such as skin color and facial features. Racial categories are broader than ethnic categories. Today, for example, the U.S. Census divides people into five racial categories: white, black or African American, American Indian or Alaska Native,  Asian, and  Native Hawaiian  or Other Pacific Islander. Modern scientists regard race as a social construct, and racial categories, like ethnic categories, have changed over time. What Is My Ethnicity? Because ethnicity is more of a cultural practice than a science, you probably grew up understanding your own ethnicity in a way that tests will never be able to measure. The food you ate, the traditions you practiced, and the language(s) you spoke are all essential aspects of your ethnic identity. If you are interested in learning more about your exact ancestry, you can do so using a variety of DNA testing services. DNA Testing for Ethnicity DNA testing—available through services such as 23andMe, MyHeritage, and LivingDNA—allows people to explore their genealogy using their genetic information. Examining DNA can reveal information about a persons ancestry and ethnic background. While the principles of DNA testing are sound, the private companies that offer this service through home-testing kits have been criticized for their methodologies. Sheldon Krimsky, a scientist at Tufts University, says that these companies don’t share their data, and their methods are not validated by an independent group of scientists. Since each company uses a different database of genetic information, Krimsky says the tests can only give an indication of probabilities: The results are in no way definitive; instead each company uses common genetic variations as the basis for saying the  probability  is that 50 percent of your DNA is, for example, from North Europe and 30 percent is from Asia, based on how it compares to the information in its database. However, if you send DNA to a second company, you might get different results, because it has a different database. The popularity of DNA testing for ancestry has also generated concerns about data privacy.

Prisoner †Creative Writing Free Essays

At least the sun’s shining on this old decrepit prison. I can’t understand why they’ve put me in this remote room, alone. I’ve just arrived. We will write a custom essay sample on Prisoner – Creative Writing or any similar topic only for you Order Now From the 1st of December until my last breath, you would expect to be greeted with open arms, wouldn’t you? It’s not like she didn’t deserve it†¦ Meeting our new friends will be as amusing as reading – I can’t think of anything worse. I’d rather listen to her baby wail, scream and shriek again. I sometimes wonder what happened to that baby, watching its mum suffer. Time is valuable, so I won’t waste it with those ‘freaks’, they’re all the same – worthless vermin. Well they’ll see, I have got it all planned out. Dear Jason, It’s hell here. I feel like Satan’s minion, sweeping, scrubbing, and sweating in this ‘hell-hole’. An insignificant ant challenging the irrefutable Mount Everest – each step is an anxious challenge; as for every single stride I make, I end up stumbling back. Pointless. There is a burden of anxiety and mental suffering depicted in the face of every man, as we are all pampered like peasants; especially Little Bill, he can’t defend himself so everyone takes advantage. I’ve just been placed with Derrick my new cellmate, the old fool’s fifty, twice my age; his senseless stories of driving his own crane in ‘the good old days’ shuttles you towards insanity – without mentioning his nauseating scar which runs the length of his face; my stomach convulses when I gaze upon it. Sneering when he answers ‘How did that happen?’- He fell down flight of stairs; he must think I’m mad to believe him. That’s the other problem, I can’t trust anyone – I will need to eventually though. ‘Bro’, when you next visit Mum’s grave can you leave a bunch of roses from me; she always cherished the aroma they produced: even though I still hate them. Do you know she’s the only thing that’s keeping me going? If only she hadn’t taken that job as ‘her’ assistant none of this would have happened. Mum didn’t deserve so much pressure, she was only the ‘messenger’ doing as she were told, without a wink of sleep in over two weeks a car accident was inevitable. But I have no remorse for what I did to ‘June’, revenge is sweet. Jake I am gazing through the confined window; the icy steel bars obstruct my route from death. The frenzied frost tearing at my tender hands. I’ll be out there soon, we will be free, I can smell it. Old, dilapidated and weathered; these bricks can’t withhold us. From slavering away in the kitchen at a Kings pace a few helpful utensils have been gathered; a carving knife, spoon and fork. These can be stored inside the T.V; no one would bother looking there. ‘Derrick? Where are you, idiot, get here. You’ve worked in the demolishing business for long enough; tell me, can we burst through now?’ ‘Too right son, too right.’ ‘Luckily this fork and spoon has lasted from wear, but it looks the knife won’t be needed ‘aye Del’.’ ‘It’s getting late my boy, move your rock of a bed back to its normal spot. The incessant stomping of the pigs will soon pass our cell. We must wait until dusk.’ The moon’s beams of lurid light echoed through the prison. A steely smell of anxiety overhauled the sound of the snoring from the convicts. This was nearly it. Weeks of planning boiled down to this. Thankfully, I’m fearless, this time I will get away, we will be free ‘Jimmy.’ We could go, now? Just leave Derrick; he’s someone we can’t trust anyway. We should desert him; he would soak up all the blame. Droplets of blood were dripping on the floor; my hands sore and weeping from pounding powerful punches like a boxer at the gapping hole in the corner of the cell – I only had to make it half a foot wider whilst being quiet as possible. A seed of adrenaline sprouted inside me, the round circle in the wall had subsided. It was time. Psyching myself was easy, I knew what had to be done. ‘ESCAPEE, AN ESCAPEY!’ I turn around horrified, standing still paralyzed. Derrick? ‘No it can’t be, y-you set me up?!’ Glaring him straight in the face – I had no choice†¦ How to cite Prisoner – Creative Writing, Papers

New Submarines for Royal Australian Navy-Free-Samples for Students

Question: Why the Australian Government Chose France to Build the New Submarines for the Royal Australian Navy. Answer: Introduction In 2016, the Australian government announced its decision to select France to construct new submarines for the countrys royal navy. As expected, the decision was a major blow to competing bidders such as Japan and Germany who offered cheaper and timely deals for the project.[1] The French company is expected to design and build a 4500-tonne conventionally powered version of its 4500-tonne nuclear powered barracuda. It is also expected that the submarine will be designed for high stealth operations and will be ideal for long range missions to deep waters..[2] However, while submitting its bid, the French company warned that it would deliver the submarines at much slower pace and higher overall cost as compared to its competitors. By and large, the decision to choose France over Germany and Japan is controversial and many believe that the decision was guided by political influences. However, the Australian government insists that the Japanese bid was a better offer and design that met Australias unique navy needs. Discussion and Analysis Firstly, the Australian government argues that the French design and offer was the best option as it would involve building the boats within the country, in Adelaide. In turn, this would result in great opportunities for hundreds of construction workers and companies within the country.[3] The government estimates that the project would create approximately 2800 job opportunities for the Australian workforce as the construction of the new vessels begin. In turn, this is expected to boost the financial and economic position of local Australians in the country. Thus, the government chose the French proposal due to the fact that in the long run, the project would bring about an improvement in the economy of the country. In addition, the Australian government chose the French design as a means to secure their political positions in the South Australia region. Specifically, the Liberals under Tony Abbott were concerned that they would lose three federal seats in the region; Boothby (7.1 percent), Hindmash (1.9 percent) and Sturt (10.1) percent. At the time, Sturt was held by Christopher Pyne, the industry minister and he feared that it would fall to labor. Notably, Pyne was prominent during the submarine announcement and needed to maintain his position after the awarding of the contract. In turn, this led to the decision that would maintain his popularity among the south Australian people, forcing him and other liberals to opt for the French design. Therefore, the willingness by the French company to perform construction work within Australia made the decision more appealing, as it would cement the political position of the government while creating significant opportunities for the local Australian s uppliers. One may also argue that the contract awarding was influenced by the fact that the Japanese company, DCNS possessed great experience in the designing and building of submarines.[4] Particularly, in its submission, DCNS claimed that its experience and propulsion technology from its nuclear and conventional submarines rendered it as the best and most preferred candidate to construct the new submarines for the Royal Australian Navy. Additionally, the DCNS technology incorporates the most sensitive passive sonar ever utilized in traditional submarines. The design also meets the high endurance and long range requirements specified by the Australian Navy. Furthermore, the French designed equipment will offer operational capability beyond the Royal Australian Navys requirements[5]. In turn, the use of these technologies made the French offer more attractive than the German and Japanese designs. According to the countrys minister of defense, the design and building capabilities offered by the DCNS was the best possible match to the countrys unique requirements for its royal navy submarine. The minister refuted reports claiming that the contract with France will cost the country a lot money for a vessel that will do way too little for the country. In his argument, Mr. Payne insists that through consistent advice from specialists in the field, there are no military-off-the-shelf submarine options that meet the countrys unique requirements[6]. He argues that a modified off-the-shelf submarine is an oxymoron. In retrospect, the French design and rapid advancements in the companys underwater military technology is the best alternative as it sufficiently matches the unique requirements of the RANS[7]. It is, therefore, for this reason that the Australian government awarded the winning bid to the French company. Irrespective of the various justifications made by the government for selecting the French company to undertake the project, the fact remains that the completion of the project by France is way too costly and time consuming than if the project was awarded to either Germany or Japan. At the onset, the project is expected to cost $50 billion[8]. The building of the submarine fleet will cost about $20 billion whereas the approximately $30 billion will be spent to sustain them after they come into operation in the middle of the next decade[9]. In addition, the French company will take a significantly longer time to complete the project as compared to the Japanese and German proposals. Conclusion All in all, all factors taken into consideration, the Australian government made the decision to award the contract to France to build the New Submarines for the Royal Australian Navy for various reasons. Firstly, the decision was made based on the fact that the French design, according to the government, would offer was the best option as it would involve building the boats within the country, in Adelaide. Consequently, it would result in promotion of local industries, local suppliers as well as create employment opportunities for the Australian people. Furthermore, the government selected the French proposal with the hope of securing its political position in the South Australia region. Likewise, the decision was informed by the fact that DCNS possessed great experience in the designing and building of submarines. Regardless, awarding of this project to France is way too costly and time consuming for Australia than if the project was awarded to either Japan or Germany. Recommendations It is recommended that before awarding any contract to a bidder, it is important for the management of a company to consider all factors such as the cost and time to be undertaken by the bidders to complete the project. Afterwards, the least costly and time efficient bidder that guarantee the highest quality should be awarded the contract. Reference List Australia, France officially sign Australias Future Submarine deal. (2016). [online] Naval Today. Available at: https://navaltoday.com/2016/12/20/australia-france-officially-sign-australias-future-submarine-deal/ [Accessed 11 Apr. 2018]. Australian Government selects DCNS for the SEA 1000 Future Submarine Program. (2016). [online] Naval Group. Available at: https://www.naval-group.com/en/news/australian-government-selects-dcns-for-the-sea-1000-future-submarine-program/ [Accessed 11 Apr. 2018]. Gady, F. S. (2017). Australias Government Under Attack Over Submarine Deal. [online] The Diplomat. Available at: https://thediplomat.com/2017/10/australias-government-under-attack-over-submarine-deal/ [Accessed 11 Apr. 2018]. Henderson, A. (2017). Australian submarines to be built in Adelaide after French company DCNS wins $50b contract. [online] ABC. Available at: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-04-26/pm-announces-france-has-won-submarine-contract/7357462 [Accessed 11 Apr. 2018]. Karp, P. (2016). France to build Australias new submarine fleet as $50bn contract awarded. [online] The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2016/apr/26/france-to-build-australias-new-submarine-fleet-as-50bn-contract-awarded [Accessed 11 Apr. 2018]. Laird, R. (2016). Building a New Class of Conventional Submarines: The Australian Case. [online] Second Line of Defense. Available at: https://sldinfo.com/2016/09/building-a-new-class-of-conventional-submarines-the-australian-case/ [Accessed 11 Apr. 2018]. Ohff, H. (2016). Why the French submarine won the bid to replace the Collins-class. [online] The Conversation. Available at: https://theconversation.com/why-the-french-submarine-won-the-bid-to-replace-the-collins-class-58223 [Accessed 11 Apr. 2018]. Stewart, C. and Nicholson, B. (2016). Submarine contract: Turnbull takes expensive long road to new subs. [online] The Australian. Available at: https://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/defence/submarine-contract-turnbull-takes-expensive-long-road-to-new-subs/news-story/32ee7d50f2c5338973b47d160f746e9f [Accessed 11 Apr. 2018]. Stewart, C. and Nicholson, B. (2016). Submarine contract: Turnbull takes expensive long road to new subs. Karp, P. (2016). France to build Australias new submarine fleet as $50bn contract awarded. Stewart, C. and Nicholson, B. (2016). Submarine contract: Turnbull takes expensive long road to new subs. Ohff, H. (2016). Why the French submarine won the bid to replace the Collins-class. Laird, R. (2016). Building a New Class of Conventional Submarines: The Australian Case. Gady, F. S. (2017). Australias Government Under Attack Over Submarine Deal. Australian Government selects DCNS for the SEA 1000 Future Submarine Program. (2016). Henderson, A. (2017). Australian submarines to be built in Adelaide after French company DCNS wins $50b contract. Australia, France officially sign Australias Future Submarine deal. (2016).